Mason-Dixon Poll Shows Texans Want
Answers Not Smoke Regarding Services
Rendered by Private Lawyers in Tobacco Deal

Texans are in no mood to pay the whopping $2.3 billion legal tab in the state’s tobacco settlement without a full public accounting by the private lawyers who helped win the case. Ninety-four percent of Texans believe the private lawyers should be required to submit an accounting of hours worked and expenses incurred before any legal fees are paid, according to a statewide Mason-Dixon public opinion poll commissioned by Houston Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse. Four percent of respondents said an itemization was unnecessary, while two percent were unsure.

There was virtually no variation in responses based on gender, race or geographic region, said Mason-Dixon pollster Del Ali.

“Paying lawyers without timesheets and expense reports is a turn-off to taxpayers,” said Jon Opelt, director of Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse. “It appears these lawyers have hidden from rather than heeded the call for accountablity. The public wants answers not smoke,” said Opelt.

The survey was conducted for CALA by Mason-Dixon, a national polling and research firm headquartered in Columbia, Maryland. The 804 registered voters surveyed were interviewed by telephone between February 27 and March 2. Interviews were conducted with a random sample of voters from across the state. The margin of error associated with the results is plus or minus 3.5 percentage points. Opelt said the Houston CALA decided to commission the poll because of conflicting survey results released about the issue.

Asked which of the following veiwpoints comes closest to their point of view, 75 percent of the survey respondents said the five private lawyers don’t deserve the $2.3 billion, even if they had a contract with the state. Thirteen percent said the only way for the state to have won its case is for the state to use private lawyers and they now deserve all the money they can get, even if it is $2.3 billion. The remaining 12 percent said they were unsure.

“Clearly, the public believes lawyers deserve fair pay not a blank check,” said Opelt. “Fees are a measurement of hours worked and risk incurred, not a bonus for slaying the dragon.”

The poll also showed that:

  • 87% of those surveyed said they would favor challenging the legal fees if they knew that the case never went to court and that state lawyers, and not the private lawyers who will be paid, conducted some of the work.
  • 84% said they approved Governor Bush’s request that the Texas Supreme Court determine whether the proposed legal fees are fair under state law.
  • 82% said they favored the Governor’s request to get court approval to reduce the fees if taxpayers might be liable for all or a portion of the legal fees.

In a related development, the chairman of Metroplex Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse (MCALA) has asked the Attorney General’s Office for copies of any billing records or other documents outlining the activities and charges by the lawyers in their service to the state. MCALA Chairman Jim Brickman of Dallas submitted the request under the state’s open records law.

“The state and its taxpayers have a right to a public disclosure of hours worked and expenses incurred in this case,” Brickman said. “For the state to be handed a bill for $2.3 billion, plus $40 million in out-of-pocket expenses with no details should not be acceptable.”

How the Poll was Conducted
The Mason-Dixion Texas Poll was conducted by Mason-Dixion Political/Media Research, Inc. of Columbia, Maryland from February 27 through March 2, 1998. A total of 804 registered Texas voters were interviewed statewide by telephone. All stated they regularly vote in state elections.

Those interviewed were selected by the random variation of the last four digits of telephone numbers. A cross-section of exchanges were utilized in order to ensure an accurate reflection of the state. Quotas were assigned to reflect the voter registration distribution.

The margin for error, according to standards customarily used by statisticians, is no more than plus or minus 3.5 percentage points. This means that there is a 95 percent probability that the “true” figure would fall within that range if the entire population were sampled. The margin for error is higher for any subgroup, such as a regional or racial grouping.

Question: As you may know, questions have been raised regarding how much money could be paid to the private lawyers in the state’s tobacco lawsut. Thinking about the dispute over how much money could be paid to the private lawyers, which of the following viewpoints comes closer to your own point of view? (Order Rotated)

The only way for the state to have won its case is for the state to use private lawyers and they now deseerve all the money they get, even if it is $2.3 billion, or

These five private law firms don’t deserve $2.3 billion, even if they had a contract with the state. Instead, they should be compensated fairly, based on the time they spent on the case.

Question: Governor Bush has gone to court to challenge the $2.3 billion legal fee, and get it reduced to a smaller amount. Do you approve or disapprove of Governor Bush’s request that the Texas Supreme Court determine whether the proposed $2.3 billion legal fee is fair under state law?
Question: If you knew thaat taxpayers might be liable for all or part of the $2.3 billion in fees to the lawyers, would you approve or disapprove of Governor Bush’s efforts to get court approval to reduce the fee?
Question: In addition to the $2.3 billion, the private lawyers in the state’s tobacco settlement claim they have incurred $40 million dollars in expenses. The lawyers have not yet submitted an accounting for their hours worked nor have they itemized their expenses. Do you believe they should be required to submit and accounting for their hours worked and an itemization of their expenses before they are paid?
Question: If you knew that the case never went to court and that some of the work was conducted bystate lawyers and not the provate lawyers who will be paid, would you favor or oppose challenging the $2.3 billion legal fee?

Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse

2500 City West Boulevard, Suite 300 • Houston, Texas 77042
E-mail: sosueme@ • Administrative: (713) 267-2302 • Fax: (713) 267-2267