1997 Lawsuit Reforms
Wrongful Discharge

For a summary of lawsuit reforms adopted in 1997 follow the links below:

Summary Judgment
Wrongful Discharge
Barratry
Fire Rescue Equipment
Out-of-state Lawsuits
Managed Care Responsibility
Interlocutory Appeals
Ice Skating Operators

Texas law properly prohibits an employer from retaliating or discriminating against an employee for filing a claim for workers' compensation benefits. Recently, judges have applied the law more broadly to protect employees from any adverse personnel action.

HB 768 restores the original intent of the statute by requiring the employee to prove that retaliation was a substantial cause of any alleged employment discrimination. Simply proving that the employee was treated differently after filing a claim will not be sufficient.

Under the new law, a wrongfully discharged employee will still be able to recover damages against an employer for retaliating against the employee, but the workers' compensation statute will not create a general cause of action for "employment discrimination." The new law restores the original intent of the statute, which is to protect the integrity of the workers' compensation system.

This case law is the result of a recent Texas Supreme Court decision. A legislative remedy, HB 768, was passed but deemed unnecessary due to the supreme court's decision adopting a "but-for" standard of liability in wrongful discharge claims.


Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse

2500 City West Boulevard, Suite 300 • Houston, Texas 77042
E-mail: sosueme@calahouston.org • Administrative: (713) 267-2302 • Fax: (713) 267-2267